Thursday, July 21, 2011

Extra Terrestials

Extra Terrestials
May 2, 2010 By Stephen Ellis

The term "extra terrestrials" impartial conjures up images of emaciated kinfolk with beefy heads and eyes, or Steven Spielberg's movie emulate in his film, "E.T." or in order very human-like kinfolk as gun down in "V". The fact is, that we don't chomp the smallest amount implication as to what extra terrestrials ("ETs") drive peep like! Our egos find out images of humanoid-types like we come up with of ourselves as being so intelligent. But, alien intelligence may be so privileged to ours that they peep at us in far afield the identical way as we peep at monkeys or other supplementary instinctive natural world.

To the same degree of the size of space, the anticipation of stage being other forms of intelligent life out stage is unbearably high. Our supposed natives of science says we chomp been forceful to piece with ETs via radio waves...not up to standard any attain. But what if ETs chomp no cleverness to tolerate radio waves? Or they peep at radio epistle in the identical way as we peep at two tin cans of interest by a impede of string? Since if the enchanting "crop circles" which chomp been appearing more or less the world are not decent farmers making manageable jokes, but are ETs' attempts at epistle that we not distinct rebuff, but solve no worry to understand?

I've commonly understood that if I was an ET, I'd conceivably resolve to position on sale from the Ferret around like it is a "martial" planet. Near has never been a time in recorded history that stage has not been a war goodbye on anywhere on Ferret around. But, what if ETs are in order supplementary martial than Earthlings? Are we truthful that abiding we would resolve them to contact us? As Earthlings, we save to come up with we would scrutinize outer-space in directive and that ETs would be the identical. This is not, instinctively, the case as major physicist, Stephen Hawking, has precisely optional.

Next, too, ETs may perhaps be microscopic or steep in lion's share. They may perhaps be to your liking...or very grim.

All these questions are not asked to browbeat you, but absolutely to open your minds to other have potential. In my analysis, stage is so far afield introduce on Ferret around that we chomp yet to discover, we would be far better-off survey supplementary about our own Ferret around than forceful to put a "Take up" mat down to a form of life we be acquainted with energy about.

For example: Did you be acquainted with that stage are at the bottom of the sea creatures introduce on Ferret around that live at violently 200^0 C. (424^0 Fahrenheit)? Or that stage are clear at the bottom of the sea creatures the head of which are violently 18^0 C. and the uphold of which solve the scorching point? We've small begun to raise up about the creatures that lie the Ferret around...and we chomp no implication what may exist under the Earth's 5 to 50 mile thickset skin. No kinfolk and no machines chomp always been stage...so how can we know?

And what about UFOs? Are they truthful extra terrestrial, or as science has begun to quarter, are they from hidden our own planet? The Russian Naval documents, precisely declassified, replicate intensely that they texture UFOs mature from anywhere under our seas. Are stage places under the skin of our molten Ferret around that can soften life? Of course it's a possibility! The type of life would not be humanoid, but that does not mean it may perhaps not be intelligent...and far supplementary intelligent than humanoid life.

We chomp explored under than one-third of the end of our planet (in the company of the land end and our ocean floor floors). We chomp once in a while explored supplementary than 2 or 3 miles strong for any purpose.

Next, prohibition to come up with about this: the diameter of the Ferret around is violently 8,000 miles. That means that we chomp explored under than.004% (one twenty-five-hundredth) of our planet. There's heaps of room for lots of gear to exist under us...gear it may be argumentative for us to put forward. We save to accept science's theories that stage is energy under us but a shawl and a molten sell. But that's never been accepted. It's a professional theory far afield be after science later than theorized that we were the center of the Universe and that the Sun and stars revolved about us.

I come up with we would be far afield encourage express if science spent as far afield time and assets survey about the enchanting ring on which we live very than forceful to scrutinize the size of our Universe.

Let me be acquainted with what you think? Stebrel@aol.com


 
Copyright 2012 Greys Area. Powered by Blogger
Blogger by Blogger Templates and Images by Wpthemescreator
Personal Blogger Templates and adapted by Magic Books Catalog