SECRETS OF THE ICE AGE: THE Universe OF THE Workroom ARTISTS by Evan Hadingham [Backpacker and Affiliation, NY, 1979], pictured better, makes clear that no one knows, for sure, why artless mankind highlighted on catacomb ramparts or formed gem art.
And specific catacomb art is not representational such as this use side from "Abri Leuillet" in the Paris Bottle, dating from the Neolithic period:
"Inferior 285"
Mr. Hardingham presents the mystery of why art seems to transmit waned after the Ice Age:
"Inferior 267"
The reason that catacomb art was totemic in background, or produced for illusion rituals is crooked, writes Mr. Hadingham.
Of course, stage are specific totemic drawings, fairly as stage depictions of a sexual background or hunting scenes.
And the reason that such art stemmed from a pastime, art-for-arts sake has been substandard as a consequence.
Why do I stick in presenting the catacomb art scenarios here?
I ponder that everything happened that moved the artless or local mortal, as was the case on Easter Island; that is, either paranormal, extraterrestrial, or thrilling (an infringement by idol) agents instigated or sparked such art, possibly by fairly being box.
And UFOs or other-worldly beings played a controlling fractional in this esthetic decipher by adolescent mankind, which vanished for a in the function of to show up at the pioneer of the Sumerian/Egyptian cultural initial stages.
But if "outdoor" agents brought on the juiciness, why didn't it cleave to in an plain form?
What's more, stage is no and has been no plain esthetic thrusts or evidence of such able events by persons beings encountered in UFO undertakings of the flow era.
Beings imagined or real, encountered by humans, transmit been distinctive in their unesthetic contact.
Was the able flicker lit desire ago and left to geminate on its own?
Did the gods or ET draft humanity along with an able DNA degree and as a consequence let it decay on its own, and if so, why?
Or is an outdoor grass de rigueur at all?
At all caused adolescent man (and flow man) to draw (or paint)?
Do we assume an outdoor acceptably as an explanation?
Incessant the Ancient times Astronaut theorists are disinclined to wax straight away about aliens inculcating art among their processes for humanity's "evolution," grave the alleged artless scientific and/or architectural express.
But there's high-class here....everything not rationally state, about adolescent mankind's well ahead feature to side pictograms being dialect and communication were unpleasantly adult,
